To help improve conversation flow,

Written by Paul Zannucci on 2:12 PM

I've removed the "moderation" requirement for comments. Have fun and don't kill anyone.

UPDATE: DUE TO THE GLORIOUS FAILURE OF THE WARNER-LIEBERMAN BILL, COMMENTS HAVE TEMPORARILY GONE BACK TO MODERATION MODE. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE INCONVENIENCE.

Handicapping 2008: New Hampshire

Written by Paul Zannucci on 9:07 AM


(Note: In addition to taking a closer look at what separates the candidates on the big issues, we’re now going to begin looking at the Electoral College race. We’ll update the predictions as circumstances change; for example, VP selections--I'm not going to try to take into account all the possibilities now. We’re going to start off by giving Obama an automatic 3 electoral point lead for the District of Columbia. Yes, it’s a shaky limb, but someone has to go out on it.)

New Hampshire Presidential Election History

Recent History:
Seven out of the last 10 elections went to the Republicans; however, three of the last 4 went to Democrats. How much of a trend is this? Well, after the first Bush presidency, NH went for Clinton and stayed with Clinton, as did many states, during the Clinton reelection. Several fairly conservative states abandoned Bush Sr. in 1992 and stayed the course in 1996. The 2004 election was a little different, however, as the conservative power states stuck with Bush despite his unpopularity, while NH went with Kerry (a nearly indefensible selection by the Democrats) though only by about 9000 votes. I have to think that one would still consider NH a slight conservative lean given that they very nearly voted for Bush twice, but I can’t really justify it either way. We’ll call this even.

Primaries:
Republicans:
In the 2000 Republican primary, NH went for John McCain over George Bush by 19%. In 2004 Bush was unopposed. In 2008 McCain took on a crowded and confused field that still included Guiliani, a well-loved moderate who, despite not really bothering to campaign, took 9%, Thompson, Paul and Huckabee. McCain ended up beating Romney by 5%. A brief look at the history seems to point to McCain being New Hampshire’s pick whenever he’s been available. We’ll give a +2% to McCain.

Democrats: As was seen earlier, NH liked Bill Clinton quite a bit (despite voting for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 primary) and came out for Hillary in 2008, though only by 2%. The state has an amazingly low number of minorities, with African Americans coming in at about 1%, so Barrack Obama can’t count on a lot of built-in help here. Not being the state’s pick in the primary is not hardly a nail in the coffin (see Tsongas/Clinton above), especially since the race was this close. Yet this Democratic primary is especially contentious, with one disaffected group battling against another. And only one of these disaffected groups lives in New Hampshire. With McCain being moderate and well-liked in New Hampshire, I’m going to have to put this one at +2% to McCain.

National Mood:
President: The electorate tends to have a short memory of positive results and a slightly longer one over negative results. Given that the circumstances behind such results are almost always glossed over, and even with our short memory spans, it’s hard to imagine that there aren’t people out there thinking on how nice things were under the Clinton administration versus the Bush administration. There’s no nice way to put it. At this time, it’s hard to imagine the country being less behind President Bush. That has to have an impact. And New Hampshire, despite being an extraordinarily wealthy state, tends to track right along with the rest of the country in their presidential approval ratings. It’s one of the things that makes NH such a bellwether swing state. I tend to want to go with more than the self-imposed maximum of +3% to Obama except that McCain is such a different candidate than Bush. The Democrat calls of this being a third term for Bush are not overly effective. Still, Bush is extraordinarily unpopular. Let’s stick with +3 to Obama.

Nitty Gritty:
In the primaries, McCain won all the NH counties that Obama won plus a couple of Clinton’s counties. The significance here is that all of the strong Obama counties are somewhat neutralized by the fact that McCain also won there. McCain won three counties Clinton won, and Clinton won the two counties where McCain lost. This means that there could be more voters who have to pick a new candidate in areas that McCain is either slightly favored (where McCain and Clinton both won), or where no primary preference was shown (neither McCain nor Obama won) and, again, the many Clinton voters are not overly happy with Obama at this point. We’ll go +2% to McCain.

Bottom Line:
New Hampshire is the quintessential swing state that could reasonably be expected to go either way. The state voted for Bush in 2000 then for Kerry (by 9000 votes) in 2004. They basically start with a clean slate. One would assume that this naturally favors the Democratic candidate in 2008, but McCain is a popular figure in the state and there might be some fall-out from a contentious Democratic primary. Considering demographics and detailed primary results, this looks like a McCain state. We’ll have to come back and revisit this if circumstances or moods change, but right now it looks like an okay lean, maybe +3%, to John McCain. The most current Real Clear Politics average at this point has McCain up by 1.4%, thought the latest poll, by Rasmussen, has Obama up by 5. Expect there to be a temporary bump in most of these polls now that Obama has “officially” won the party nomination.

John McCain wins New Hampshire's 4 Electoral Votes:
Current CP total: McCain 4, Obama 3.

I am grumpy and tired and I want to rant…..

Written by Anonymous on 8:51 AM

I guess I just woke up on the wrong side of the bed so a little item set me off this morning. I was listening to the news on the radio and heard about an Obama rally in Bristol TN (I think, I was still half asleep). The station ran a piece of an interview with a lady who said something along the lines of the following: “I was in middle school when JFK was elected (Camelot again). I can’t remember another time when I felt so good about the possibility of change”. Just so everyone is clear this in not an exact quote but I am fairly sure it is close.

The specific item that made my blood boil is the whole concept of feeling good. What has happened to logic and reason in making decisions? I am sick and tired of liberals getting a free pass based on idealism versus results. If I tell my boss I am trying as hard as I can and I have the best intentions but I don’t produce I will be fired. However when a liberal says I am trying to help the poor, the children, the elderly, the under privileged, the environment and so on they are judged strictly on intentions not the end results. Why do we continue to let this happen?

As a staunch conservative I truly believe in limited government and especially lower taxes. Never once have I tried to kill a child or an old person nor do I intend too. I believe in conservation just not at the cost of progress. I believe in the power of the individual to succeed and make the right choices. I believe in the power of churches and local organizations to take care of their own (if the federal government would give the power and money back to the local folks and individuals to do that). I do not believe that the government was every intended to or should be in the business of taking care of me or anyone else. The government was put in place to primarily protect freedom by providing national defense (a strong military the one thing liberals think the government shouldn’t do).

We need to run rapidly away from the whole concept of sending our hard earned wages to liberals under the umbrella of helping people. We need to put our foot down to socialized medicine. We need to put our foot down to socialized retirement (social insecurity as I refer to it). We need to put our foot down to socialized welfare. We need to put our foot down to social engineering (homosexual marriages, legalized abortion, etc.). We just need to put our foot down to rampant liberalism. Wake up before we become a completely socialized country where your only freedom is those which the Obamas of the world will allow you to have. Wake up before it’s too late. God Bless America.

The Flatulence Tax

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:21 PM

Under the Kyoto Protocol to combat global warming, New Zealand must reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

In the past New Zealand's farmers have showed their disgust at government plans to impose an animal "flatulence tax" by sending parcels of manure to members of parliament.

The OECD conference is discussing climate change, trade and the global economy.


Did you ever read something that just made you wish for a swift death?

The time to unify has come

Written by Paul Zannucci on 12:36 PM


The time for unity has come, but not for the Democrats, for Republicans and conservatives. And, no, we don't need to organize a protest vote for Ron Paul. Despite the moaning of the average conservative, there are vast differences between McCain and Obama, and it is at McCain's side that we should stand.


Besides the "Go-Straight-to-Pennsylvania-Avenue" card that a third party would hand Obama, there are, indeed, some pretty compelling differences between McCain and Obama all across the party platforms. In the coming weeks, we'll examine many of these areas in detail, demonstrating why a conservative should be enthusiastic about a McCain presidency. For today, however, we are going to simply take a very brief look at two main reasons why Pitney and I have come out so strongly in favor of McCain.


Judiciary

You can go here to read Pitney's great piece on the selection of judges. The judicial branch of our government has overstepped its intended boundaries regularly and repeatedly. It is part of liberal pragmatism that they will take their victories any way they can get them. The ends justify the means even if the means rapes out constitution, and having judges legislate from the bench definitely falls under that category.


Security

Obama's plans for a whirlwind love fest with the axis of evil speaks for itself. If you find a cobra in your bed, you don't grab a flute and try to win it over. Liberal naivete is fine--it's what makes them cute and kickable. But it is not okay in the role of Commander-in-Chief. Obama can dance around the campaign trail dropping rose petals out his bottom all the way to November, but the reality is something altogether different. If you don't stand strong against your enemies, then you will not long stand at all.


McCain for President. McCain for America. McCain 2008.


Just for the record, I'm not apologizing.

Written by Paul Zannucci on 12:29 PM

Faced with liberal indignation, Republicans have a history of backing down, apologizing, quitting, whatever. I made an RFK, Hillary Clinton assassination joke this morning (remember that's why she's staying in the race, after all), and I stand by it. It may not be funny, but it's my joke and it's not going anywhere.

This site is not politically correct, and it doesn't pander to liberal emotions. Get used to it.



Paul Zannucci

Camelot Again

Written by Anonymous on 7:47 AM

This is great news for the home team. Every time our beloved friends on the left feel an oncoming loss they try to resurrect so called Camelot. The most recent news has Caroline Kennedy as a possible running mate (correction: as helping find a running mate) for Obama. I nearly did cartwheels (which would of course have landed me in the hospital) when this story crossed my path. We have them on the run folks. God Bless America

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/caroline-kennedy-joins-obama-veep-search-team/

Today is the Anniversary of RFK's Assassination

Written by Paul Zannucci on 6:32 AM


But he died the next day. This is probably why Hillary is waiting until Saturday. If no one kills Obama by then, she's just going to give up.
__________

Meanwhile, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a prominent, former fundraiser for Obama, has been convicted of bribery and fraud. Is it just me, or should Obama have known better than to trust someone named Antoin "Tony" Resko? That just sounds like the name of a walking scandal, and that comes from someone of Italian descent.

Rezko didn't help Obama with his presidential campaign, and Barack will skate by on this thanks to that and to a complicit media. The inability to pick the the right people to associate with is a serious problem, however. From Rezko and the church to, well, Michelle, Barack is obviously oblivious when it comes to sizing up people. I bet the folks in Iran can't wait to win him over.
__________

Speaking of winning over Iran, the brilliant Thomas Sowell uses it as one reason to support McCain in this piece, Obama and McCain.
__________

In this story, Go Johnny--Go Johnny--It's Your Birthday--Go Johnny, a substance in red wine, when taken in lunatic amounts, may help to slow aging and maybe even reverse a little of the damage. The substance, resveratrol, can be obtained either by drinking 100 bottles of red wine each day or via supplement. I'd say it just depends on who wins the election as to which way I'd go.

Clinton dropping out on Friday? God Bless Elk Point.

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:12 PM

She's done according to this earth shattering ABC piece, Clinton Preparing to Drop Out of Presidential Race.

I believe I speak for the entire civilized world when I say, "Whatever." Stop talking about it and just drop out, already.

UPDATE: Now it's Saturday. I should have kept all these reports in the same post. According to reports from Fox and Friends First, she has been encouraged to end the race by Charlie Rangel and Barnie Frank. Side note: Can you imagine being a part of a party in which you are expected to take the advice of these two seriously?
__________

In much more wonderful news, a new oil refinery might actually be built in the U.S. thanks to the amazing voters of Elk Point, S.D. In this story, Union County approves zoning ordinance for Hyperion, we learn that a whopping 58% of voters had enough intact guts left after the traditional anti-oil publicity campaign to still vote for the new zoning, called Energy Center Planned Development.

In a county with a mere 10,000 registered voters, the project will create 4500 construction jobs and then over 1800 full time permanent jobs at between $20 and $30 per hour in pay. It will handle 400,000 barrels a day and help...well, everything but the imaginary carbon problem.

God Bless Elk Point!

Time to make my choice

Written by Anonymous on 5:10 PM

Where do I stand? With the democratic primaries drawing to a conclusion (I think), the time draws near to make my decision. Even today I have on ongoing internal battle over voting for McCain. In my humble opinion he has spent way too much time in the middle compromising. I wish my dream of a true blue conservative would have come true but that is not the way the cookie crumbled. I am left mulling over a so called moderate maverick.

My choice will be to step in the booth and pull the lever for McCain. For me the most important consideration is Supreme Court nominations. Presidents come and go but the judges they choose last well beyond their administrations. Several of the current judges are in failing health and may retire soon. As a country we can not afford to have the highest court in the land take a further turn towards making law. We can not afford justices who believe the Constitution is a living document. We can not afford to have justices who are more than willing to overturn the “will of the people” to further a personal political agenda.

My friends we can not afford to elect Obama (or Clinton) for fear of their nominations. I can assure you any judge they set forward will absolutely support the radical left agenda. We will be staring down the face of having to accept homosexual marriages, radical gun control, limited speech, minority rules and on and on and on. I hope if nothing else this scares you to the booth to vote against a long standing push to the left. We must at all costs protect the Presidency until we have moved the Court back to a group of strict constitutionalists.

I realize that McCain is not many of our first (or even second) choice but we can not let that stand in our way. He is our candidate now and we must insure he is elected. The “religious right” must get off their duffs as they have in the last two elections and protect themselves. If a country allows moral decline they are only a step away from collapse. If the court moves any further to the left we will see the principles of the “Ten Commandments” upon which our laws are founded completely trampled under. I for one will not let this happen. I believe we still have a chance to turn this decline around and my vote against Obama is one of many steps I will take to stop the slide. God Bless America.

Just a reminder on the O'Reilly auction...

Written by Paul Zannucci on 4:04 PM

If you were waiting until the last day to get in on the Charity Flag Auction to benefit Operation Shoebox, well your time has come. The auction ends at 9:30 PDT.

To view go to the auction, click here.

To visit Operation Shoebox, click here.

Honestly, the prices aren't all that bad for a one-of-a-kind gift, and you can't find a better cause.

What? No mention of the real dream ticket, McCain and Clinton?

Written by Paul Zannucci on 1:59 PM

If the headline of this article made you, as they say, throw up just a little bit in the back of your throat, then you might be an old-fashioned Republican. You probably believe in partisan politics when the other side is clearly wrong. You might even be so far gone as to see compromising with a liberal as moving half-way in the wrong direction. Well, if this describes you, as it does me, we should be aware that we are as in vogue these days as short-shorts on men.

Yummy.

But this is not about your antiquated wardrobe or the carefully planned erosion of liberty. Nyet, comrade. This is about big ideas. This is about renegade politics. This is about holding hands and unity and butterfly kisses. Remember during the 2004 election how the media opined romantically about the possibility of a Kerry-McCain ticket? Certainly there was some history between the two men that made that a slight possibility, but that was hardly the only reason offered by the media for this same-sex union. McCain was a renegade. A man who flamboyantly flaunted his departures from party lines. He was a reasoned moderate, neither here nor there; not hot, not cold. He was the Dalai Lama of politics. Marrying these two men in unholy matrimony would have brought amazing unity to America, so the liberal pundits said. They would create an unstoppable ticket.

And does this not apply even more today? McCain is just as much a renegade, adopting a platform that is so similar to Obama's that it takes a team of kindergartners playing the "what's different" game to find where they diverge. And Hillary thinks of herself as the Meriwether Lewis of female politicians. That's two great renegades coming together in blissful political union. Plus, she has so many dedicated, disaffected followers that by joining up with McCain she would certainly unify the country and create a winning ticket for November.

Of course, there are downsides. Diehard conservatives all across America are already on suicide watch. And at least half of us would become instant hypocrites. So conditioned to be ashamed of our conservative ideas, we tend to lavish affection on any deserters to our cause. How else do you explain the tingly feeling so many get whenever Bernie Goldberg or Dick Morris get on television? That's right, many a conservative would suddenly feel compelled to adore Hillary Clinton.

And for those of us who could not manage that, we could at least console ourselves that there would be no Obama in the White House--and with complaining every time they moved Hillary to a safe location (kidding).

But we won't hear about the "dream ticket" from the media this time around because now McCain is the Republican nominee and the enemy. We've even had our first celebrity endorsement of leaving Earth if he becomes president. Even as good a story as this would make, it likely won't get put out there because most in the media are, first and foremost, committed to the liberal cause, and for the next few months there will be no room for anything but poking holes in McCain and lavishing Obama with old-fashioned free love. Come to think of it, go ahead and get out those short-shorts. We'll need them to be in style until after the election.

No wonder liberals like Obama: Convenient Morality

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:24 AM

<----Medal of Honor for the Libs


From The Huffington Post we have this little gem by R.J. Eskow, Letter to a Clinton Supporter. In it we find the author explaining his differences of opinion with the Clinton supporters and his hopes, though he won't beg, that they will find their way back to the party in time to celebrate Obama's coming victory.

Mr Eskow writes, "Sure, we've had our differences. We've seen the Clintons in very different ways, you and I - especially their campaign tactics. Where you've seen honest if tough campaigning, I've seen the cynical manipulation of divisive emotions and a desire to put self before others."

Just like Obama, liberals have spent most of the last twelve years worshiping at a church (First United Clinton) with an atrocious history. The Clintons are egomaniacal political scum. Anyone paying attention has known this for ages. The general voter can be forgiven, but the liberal political commentators and those at the top of the Democratic party cannot. The leading liberals didn't decide to throw the Clintons to the dogs until a pretty alternative came along. Congratulations Mr. Eskow for making this decision to come out against the Clintons when it was convenient for you.

From the Whitewater days in Arkansas to vandalizing the White House on the way out, it would take me all day to chronicle the reasons an "in touch" liberal should have dropped this crew long ago. Just as Obama was sitting in the congregation listening to hate spew forth from his minister for years, the Democrats smiled and nodded at all the Clinton tricks, all the while knowing these folks were power hungry hooligans.

Want to see the proof that liberal leaders knew the Clintons were bad news and didn't care? Look no further than to what happened when Obama came along. Here were the Clintons who, by their accomplishments, should have been considered modern day progressive heroes, and here was Hillary Clinton, potentially the first female president and wildly popular with the electorate. And then here came Obama. He couldn't defeat Hillary in the Democratic stronghold states or in the popular vote overall (remember how important this popular vote used to be to Democrats?), but the party leaders started selling this guy as though he were the messiah. Next thing you know, the liberal controlled media is hammering away at Hillary and depicting Obama as the unstoppable leader of an unrivaled movement--despite the fact he wasn't winning the majority of the democratic votes. It was a an orchestrated con job on the electorate that is still going on today, and all because they saw a convenient way to chuck the Clintons. They suddenly had an option and a hallelujah moment couldn't be far behind.

Perhaps that explains why Obama is getting a virtual pass in the mainstream media for attending the church of hate for twenty years before chucking them when it became convenient. It's because they are liberals, and they fully understand the concept of convenient morality.

Walter Williams: Dumb or Ill-Informed

Written by Paul Zannucci on 7:17 AM

No, Mr. Williams is neither dumb nor ill-informed. The question is which of these two options does congress think describes the American public? Personally, I vote for both. Read this article about our energy problems and the "solutions" proposed by congress by clicking here.

Obama's Church Apology and Defection

Written by Paul Zannucci on 6:16 AM

From Townhall.com we have a Thomas Sowell piece: Irrelevant Apologies

Writing about Obama's recent defection from his church after being Pflegerized, Sowell points out the obvious, which the media nevertheless has missed, "For any politician, what matters is not his election year rhetoric, or an election year resignation from a church, but the track record of that politician in the years before the election."

Let's make something clear. This is a deserving dead horse Sowell is whipping here. That church has been proven to be a consistent source of racial hatred, preaching divisive sermons one after another. I even heard one African American commentator shrug it off the other day by saying (paraphrased), "Well, if you were familiar with the African American experience you wouldn't be so shocked at hearing this." I suppose that's like being familiar with the Hamas movement and not being shocked by suicide bombers. If you're reading this site, I know that you are not likely the type of person who has given Obama a free pass on this, but the mainstream media is ready to move on, and we can't let them.

It is not acceptable to be associated with a church of hate for 20 years and to quit only in the middle of a presidential election. It is not at all okay to surround yourself with hate and then only extricate yourself when the polls say it is time to do so.

This is one dead horse that needs to keep being beaten.

Wisely, Obama just ignores Clinton for the moment...

Written by Paul Zannucci on 11:05 PM

From FoxNews: Obama in St. Paul: “Tonight, I can stand before you and say that I will be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.”

I suppose this is his own way to apply pressure. Truly, he doesn't need to wait for her concession. He just needs to come out and declare himself the victor. Everyone realizes that, by all reasonable standards, he's won the Democratic Party nomination. Clinton's only hope is a massive scandal (see the next post down).

I can only imagine what the Obama camp was thinking as they watched Hillary make her case for being the best candidate only moments before his acceptance speech.

What the heck is going on here?

Written by Paul Zannucci on 10:40 PM


Is this the end for Clinton or the Clinton endplay. Over the last 24 hours or so we’ve learned twice that Clinton was going to concede and, now, twice that she is not. We’ve also heard a growing rumble of chatter regarding an already infamous, yet quite possibly imaginary, video of Michelle Obama raving about “Whitey”. This chatter has leapt from the blogs and onto cable news stations, with Bob Beckel this morning on FoxNews claiming that the “bombshell” would be released Wednesday morning. Given that Paris Hilton is already free, this can only mean something else, but the whole thing is getting more than a little confusing.

I guess there are three main possibilities. There’s a tape and the Republicans have it. The rumor is mostly true as reported. Second option, there is no tape but the Hillary camp has been floating rumors of one to serve an unknown purpose (Republicans wouldn’t be floating rumors at this point). Or third, the tape is not there and the Clintons aren’t pushing the concept. This is actually my pick.

Rumors of the “whitey tape” all started, so far as I can tell, some time back with Larry Johnson over at the No Quarter blog. Larry is so far up Hillary’s ass that you can barely see his toes hanging out her bottom. Instead of waiting for the email, he gets her talking points as she thinks them. Either that or little gray beings from outer space deliver them each evening telepathically. Given all that, I hardly ever know when to take his site seriously. I mean, I would give Johnson full credit for breaking the “Karl Rove will be indicted” story, but I have to deduct a point since, well, there was no indictment.

So anyway, Johnson started this rumor regarding the tape and that, naturally, got picked up by many other bloggers because most of us bloggers never went to journalism school and don’t understand the difference between an actual source and a raving lunatic. Eventually, the blogger chatter grew so great that even analysts on the cable news shows and respected websites began to disseminate the information. This news is everywhere. I even sacrificed 25 IQ points to read a thread on it over at democraticunderground.com while preparing to write this piece.

So what’s going on—the concession, the no concession, the concession, the no concession, the “whitey tape”? Beats the hell out of me, but I doubt it’s that Clinton is trying to secure the nomination on the heels of a bombshell video.

First of all, if there is a video, which I highly doubt, it is not going to be distributed by the Republicans tomorrow (Wednesday) as the rumors have it. I have no inside information on this, but why would the Republicans want to damage McCain and help Hillary? They have to hold this imaginary tape until the last possible moment and then release it to the media right before the November elections. The Republican organization is nothing if not naïve and clumsy, but even this is something they can handle.

Second, given that there is likely no video, what could be Hillary’s motives if it is her camp providing the information to Johnson? Is she blackmailing for a VP spot or to pay off her debt? Pretty unlikely, but let’s look at it. Hillary’s campaign is over $40 million in debt, and there have been rumors (the usual bloggers with their sources) that she already has been working behind the scenes to strike a deal with the Obama camp to pay off her debt. And that really wouldn’t be a lot of money to pay to get rid of her and her marauding hoard of blogging goons. After all, liberals are like human ATM’s to Obama. He can raise this money in less than a month, particularly since he’s clinched the number of delegates needed to be the nominee.

But besides the blogging goons, there’s another good reason to appease Hillary and this is where the problem sets. Many of her supporters are miffed. Actually, that’s quite an understatement. Many of her supporters are enraged, believing this election was stolen from them (they’re mostly getting this, so far as I can tell, from the blogging goons). And McCain? Well, he’s not that conservative, is he? From communicating with a number of Clinton supporters and reading on various sites, it would appear that a decent number of them would defect to McCain in the fall or just not vote at all. That just won’t work in what is predicted to be a close election. But there’s a solution. For only about $40 million (and maybe the VP spot) I know someone who can help to smooth that out a bit for you.

So there’s good reason for Obama to do what Clinton wants with or without a video. I could be wrong. There could be a video released in the next day or two that causes the superdelegates to begin a defection to Hillary. But I’ll be glad to eat crow if that is the case. I think it’s much more likely that she just calls it a campaign tomorrow and uses the leverage of unifying the party to get her debts paid and to plead her case for VP.

Clinton to concede to Obama according to AP reports

Written by Paul Zannucci on 11:30 AM

Fresh off of reports that there has been a surge of superdelegates towards Obama today, likely timed to allow him to make a speech at the conclusion of tonight's voting declaring himself the Democratic nominee, we have reports that Clinton will concede the race tonight.

According to Ms. Puerto Rico's senior officials, as soon as Obama reaches the correct number of delegates, Clinton will acknowledge the obvious, though she will continue to speak out on such issues as health care.

According to the article, she's been at home with her husband (that must be uncomfortable) phoning friends and supporters.

update: Clinton has released a statement stating she will not concede tonight and that the AP story is wrong.

Undoubtably, she'll wait until tomorrow. I'm guessing that they just don't want to impact today's voting, so they had to put out something.

update: And now she's conceding again.

Eating Insects, Iran Nukes, Cap and Spend

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:46 AM



Earlier this year the Food and Agriculture Organisation held a conference to discuss how entomophagy - eating insects as food - could contribute to sustainable development.

If we can just keep becoming more and more progressive, perhaps some day we can work this concept into legislation. Just think how healthy it would be for Mother Earth if only we were required to put, say, 20% ground worm into ground beef.
__________

From The Wall Street Journal: Cap and Spend

As the Senate opens debate on its mammoth carbon regulation program this week, the phrase of the hour is "cap and trade." This sounds innocuous enough. But anyone who looks at the legislative details will quickly see that a better description is cap and spend. This is easily the largest income redistribution scheme since the income tax.

Hmm. Copying and pasting that was a lot easier than writing these long tirades as I've done the last few days. Let's try it again.

Ms. Boxer expects to scoop up auction revenues of some $3.32 trillion by 2050. Yes, that's trillion. Her friends in Congress are already salivating over this new pot of gold.

Okay, I have to stop now. I'm beginning to feel this tingly, inspired feeling.
__________


Sen. John McCain Monday called for tougher worldwide pressure on Iran and painted his potential rival Sen. Barack Obama as naive about the Middle East.

Oh, come on, John. Give peace a chance. Obama is going to open up a dialogue with Ahmadinejad.
__________


All together now:

"Imagine there's no countries,
It isn't hard to do.
Nothing to kill or die for,
No religion too.

Imagine all the people
Living life in peace..."

I feel so enlightened now, don't you? I can't wait for Obama to head over there and spread the love.
__________


I'm pretty certain I saw my first ad for this election about thirty-two years ago. At that time, Obama was only fourteen and a little idealistic.

"The sooner we can bring the party together, the sooner we can start focusing on McCain in November," Obama told reporters in Michigan.
__________


Congressional Democrats want to ban Pentagon propaganda on the Iraq war, but they are likely to find that enforcement is easier said than done..."At the end of the day, a lot of what the Defense Department is doing is trying to raise support for the military," said Ken Bacon...Last month, the House passed legislation to prohibit the military from engaging in "any form of communication in support of national objectives..."

Make up your own string of expletives to go with this.


Reports of the death of the Warner-Lieberman bill have been greatly exaggerated

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:23 AM


Debate in the Senate over this bill should begin today, and word is that it doesn't stand much of a chance of getting passed. And even if it does manage to scrape its way out of congress, President Bush would only veto it. Even as the bill prepares to, we hope, go down in flames, we get wind from this CNN article that "supporters concede that the debate will set the scene for action in 2009."

And why shouldn't the supporters of the bill be optimistic? For all the conservative anger over Bush, everyone should realize he's the last president we'll have for awhile who would veto this bill. A quick trip to the presidential candidates' websites gives us this information:

Ms. Puerto Rico supports: "A new cap-and-trade program that auctions 100 percent of permits alongside investments to move us on the path towards energy independence"

Barack Obama supports: "Cap and Trade: Obama supports implementation of a market-based cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions by the amount scientists say is necessary: 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050."

John McCain believes: "Climate Policy Should Utilize A Market-Based Cap And Trade System."

So any failure this year should really only be seen as a first step to passage in 2009. A "cap and trade" system has many features, after all, that a visionary, progressive politician could grow fond of. What's not to love about having more control over businesses, raising billions of tax dollars through carbon auctions, and getting to decide where to redistribute that wealth?

Is there still time to prevent this overwhelming infringement upon liberty? Well, there is an election in November, and all the House of Representatives is up for grabs, but if you've been following public opinion lately, you likely know how this is going to turn out. And why should anyone be motivated by liberty anymore anyway? After years of suffering low blows at the hands of the righteously indignant left, conservatives have become a bunch of feel good appeasers and enablers for the erosion of freedom.

Ah, America. What have you done? Where have you gone?