Republicans "Swiftboating" Democrats on Energy?

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:29 AM

I've actually seen a few liberal blogs, which I refuse to link to, who are now making the claim that Republicans are "swiftboating" the Democrats on energy.

Let's get this straight, Republicans are partially to blame for the current crisis. They sat back for years and let the global warming hysteria and anti-drilling movement go uncontested. But that is where the heart of this energy and economic crisis is--environmental activism driving down supply. Which political party do you think is leading that charge?

And which party do you think is leading the mass ignorance about nuclear power? We are the only major economy that treats nuclear energy with the same superstitious wariness usually reserved for black cats and walking under ladders. And it can all be traced to Democratic fear mongering, Democratic politicians "looking out for you" in order to get your vote.

One can only wish that the entire country would wake up as the people of West Virginia woke up. It wasn't that long ago that West Virginia used to vote Democrat in the presidential election with great regularity. Finally, the people realized that the candidates they were voting for were against West Virginia coal production, and they voted for G.W. Bush twice and are leaning to McCain in this election. Now it's not just a matter of local coal production. No matter where you live, you have good reason to vote the energy nay-sayers out of office.

Drill Here, Drill Now

Obama prepares to flip-flop on Iraq

Written by Paul Zannucci on 2:59 PM

Using his strategist, David Axelrod, Obama now is backtracking on his Iraq stance, saying that he will certainly listen to military advisers as to when he will pull out.

Obama Flip-flops on Iraq

Homosexual Sets World Sprint Record

Written by Paul Zannucci on 9:23 AM

This one was just too funny to pass up...Homosexual Sets World Sprint Record

Israel, please just go ahead.

Written by Paul Zannucci on 12:34 PM


Israel, I don't really know what your intentions are during this standoff with Iran. Some folks are suggesting that this is all just a bluff to maintain pressure on the Iranian and world leaders to work for change. I hope that is not the case.


Mind you, you must do what you believe is best for Israel. You know your own military capabilities and Iran's better than I do. If you think it would be folly to launch a conventional attack and don't feel you could get away with a non-conventional attack, then so be it. That will, however, just make the world a much more dangerous place.


Iran's regime is true evil. Allowing them to enrich uranium for weapons is potential suicide. This is nothing at all like the North Korean situation. For years, North Korea's leaders plead with the world to open dialogue with them. Their entire nuclear development program, now being dismantled, was little more than a cry for recognition and assistance. Not so with Iran.


Iran's leaders constantly lash out at the non-Muslim world, making grandiose threats. They actively, if covertly, fight against American troops in Iraq and gleefully support Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations. They cannot be allowed to advance their weapons program.


Israel. If you are waiting on the rest of the world, it will be too late. The U.N. security council is a joke. And if you are waiting on American support, it's not coming. The Yanks have lost their way under the constant barrage of negativity over Iraq. Unfortunately, you will fight this battle on your own. But, in my opinion, you will have to fight it at some point whether you want to or not. Wouldn't it be better to fight it now while Iran does not have nuclear capabilities?

A new online outlet for conservative political donations and activism

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:02 AM

On July 1st, 2008, a new project will be launching that will help coordinate and advance the conservative cause by encouraging donations and activism. www.LetsGetThisRight.com will be a tool to focus on electing McCain and select other candidates, and also to target specific regions. Also launching will be a Slatecard.com area that will allow you to donate to McCain and any or all of the other candidates featured on the Let’s Get This Right site. These are candidates that have a real chance in November but are not receiving a great deal of party support. The Slatecard address is www.slatecard.com/slatecards/letsgetthisright.

I think this is a great project, particularly for the regional candidates who need our support. You can also attach issue “badges”, like “Drill Here. Pay Less.” badges, to your contributions to allow you to show the issues that are important to you when you contribute. To read more about the importance of sites like this to the conservative movement, go here.

Evil Conservatives to Kill Santa Claus, Polar Bears and Penguins

Written by Paul Zannucci on 1:25 PM

(All of these photos were a part of news stories about the plight of polar bears and included misleading captions about melting ice.)






Thanks to the resurgent and politically powerful idea of drilling for more oil, the Democrats have decided to unleash an old story via the complicit media today, the fact that there is a chance that the North Pole will be ice-free this year.

This is a story that's been around since last September, when the North Pole came very close to losing all it's ice. In fact, the first article about it came out shortly before then, in August. You can see the progression of this story on Science Daily, which keeps a large and searchable archive:





Of course, there was never the political need to really hammer the issue until now, now that Democrats are at risk of being crucified by the average voter for stonewalling on the offshore drilling ban. So today every news outlet in America is running the story. God help Santa, polar bears and penguins.

Of course, penguins don't live in the arctic, but just a few years ago we were hearing about retreating ice in Antarctica and how this was endangering penguins. Oops. Ice is actually advancing in Antarctica. In fact, there was more global ice in April of this year than since we began measuring some 30 years ago.

Perhaps we better move to the Northern Hemisphere if we want to advance our cause. Say 'hello' to the North Pole and polar bears.

Polar bears are fluffy and cute and are nearly as good as penguins to advance a cause. They are also the first (that I'm aware of) animal to be placed on the endangered list as a preemptive measure. Polar bear population estimates are hard to get, but most authorities on the topic agree that the population is stable right now. Nevertheless, we've had to endure months of ridiculous photos and captions depicting "stranded" polar bears standing on small pieces of ice, or bears swimming through the ice-filled water as though, just a moment ago, everything in the picture had been solid ice.

No one can argue that there is less ice at the North Pole now than there use to be. It may even go "off the rocks" this year. But the fact is that we don't really know what is going on. Alarmists blame this on CO2, but it is a fact that global ice was up as of April; and even in the Northern Hemisphere, the ice sheet in Greenland is actually growing, much to climate change alarmist confusion. Don't worry, though. They'll figure out some way of cramming this fact into their CO2 data. And if they don't? Well, there's always pictures of frolicking polar bears to put out there. Oh, and if we can do it and impact the election, so much the better.

Look for pictures of drowning Santa Clauses soon.

Watch the telethon for our troops until midnight tonight (6-26-08)

Written by Paul Zannucci on 4:41 PM

McCain: He's Not Just the Lesser of Two Evils

Written by Paul Zannucci on 12:01 PM





There are many compelling reasons to vote for John McCain. Near the top of the list is Barack Obama, but I would argue that the best reason is John McCain, himself--a man of faith and principles, a fiscal and social conservative in the model of Ronald Reagan.

Taxation: Instead of proposing tax increases and allowing some of the Bush tax cuts to expire, as Barack Obama is suggesting, McCain is fully for the Reagan model of economic stimulus--giving the economy more of its own money to invest in itself and grow. Taken from John McCain's campaign website, these are the topic headers about his plans regarding taxation:


  • John McCain Will Cut Taxes For Middle Class Families
  • John McCain Will Double The Personal Exemption For Dependents
  • John McCain Will Keep Tax Rates Low--Entrepreneurs should not be taxed into submission
  • John McCain Will Maintain The Current Income And Investment Tax Rates And Fight The Democrats' Plans For A Crippling Tax Increase In 2011
  • John McCain Will Make It Harder To Raise Taxes
  • John McCain Will Reduce The Federal Corporate Tax Rate To 25 Percent From 35 Percent
  • John McCain Will Ban Internet Taxes
  • John McCain Will Ban New Cell Phone Taxes
  • John McCain Will Establish Permanent Tax Credit Equal To 10 Percent Of Wages Spent On R&D
  • John McCain Will Propose An Alternative New And Simpler Tax System – And Give America A Real Choice
If you are a conservative, that should be a pretty exciting list of proposals regarding taxation, and it's a certain sign that John McCain "gets it". Lower taxes spur growth and raise revenue. Why is raising revenue important? Because deficit spending is a main issue driving the value of the dollar down. In case you don't know, we print more money when we deficit spend. In that sense, money becomes just another commodity in the supply and demand formula.


Limited Government: So what does McCain say about government spending?


  • John McCain Will Stop Earmarks, Pork-Barrel Spending, And Waste
  • John McCain Proposes A One-Year Spending Pause To Evaluate Programs
  • John McCain Has The Leadership And Courage To Make The Right Spending Choices
  • Eliminate Broken Government Programs
  • John McCain Will Reform Social Security
  • John McCain Will Act To Control Medicare Growth
If you think McCain is just blowing smoke on these issues, you are wrong. McCain is perhaps the most "anti-spending" member of the Senate and has proposed $0 in earmark and pork spending.



Social Issues: If you're a social conservative and aren't impressed yet, consider this abbreviated laundry list of goals:

  • Excellence, Choice, and Competition in American Education
  • Securing the Border
  • Overturning Roe v. Wade
  • Protecting Marriage
  • Addressing the Moral Concerns of Advanced Technology
  • Protecting Children from Internet Pornography
And, of course, all of this doesn't mention his plans to improve trade, to drill for oil, to improve the security of America, to improve the plight of America's veterans and to have a strong and sensible foreign policy.

The bottom line, my friends, is that McCain is absolutely NOT the lesser of two evils. John McCain is a very good man and a very good leader. He is not the lesser; he is the greater--the greater choice for 2008.

Breaking News

Written by Anonymous on 8:03 AM

In breaking news today Barack Obama announced he would eliminate the Department of Homeland Security. Sources close to the candidate say that his policies of “meeting and talking” to terrorist leaders will all but eliminate any threat they may have been. The same sources are also quick to admit that they feel no such threat ever existed. This announcement was followed closely by a statement that a new cabinet post would be created, The Department of Greenland Security. Speculation is that Al “No Carbon Footprint” Gore will head this new department following several closed door meetings between the two party leaders. A brief summary of the department’s objectives follows:

By 2012 all clothing will need to be made from organically grown materials and assembled by United States union shops (please note that it will still be illegal to smoke the material)
An immediate cars for bicycles trade will be established
All farms must grow organic corn for ethanol (details are still being worked out on how farmers will be able to plant with out tractors, combines etc. as we all know that mass scale farming “rapes” the planet)
Households will be allowed small organic gardens (you will be only allowed to produce enough food for you own use as we will be pushing forward a law preventing the sale of these goods to friends and neighbors. As further explanation profit from the sales would only lead to a reversal of the good we will be accomplishing)
Power companies will be shutting down after 7 PM each evening (you may have a small wind or water powered generator as long as it creates no noise pollution and the source does not disturb any local wildlife: although we have yet to find any source where this is possible)
Households will be allowed to own a single goat for milk production (cows create too much flatulence leading to global warming). You will of course need to gain the goat’s permission prior to stealing her milk. A separate sub branch will be established to handle goat complaints.
An additional law banning meat from all sources will also be enacted for several reasons. First the health risks. Second the well know and established effects of cow flatulence (we assume the same from other sources). Third the impact of fishing on the world’s oceans.

This list is far from exhaustive as details are just becoming available. We will continue to monitor and notify our readers around this ongoing development.

The Fight is On!

Written by Anonymous on 5:30 PM

Just give up. The election is over. Crown Obama and move on. I am so sick of the media’s idea that the race is complete. We haven’t even hit the meat and potatoes yet. I just point this out to simply make sure that the good guys don’t start taking this garbage to heart. (As my friend Paul likes to say it makes me want to hurl) Those of us who are vocal need to make sure we do everything we can to excite our base. We need to get them talking about the important issues like energy, national security, conservative justices and taxes. We need to put a damper on this Obama “excitement” that is being driven for free by the media. We don’t get the advantage of “free advertising” that Obama does. The conservative pundits, blogs, etc. do not give their candidates free passes like the “main stream media” does for Obama. So we need to double our efforts to make sure we focus on the key platform items we do agree with. I don’t know about you but I can’t personally afford Obama and his Socialistic agenda. I completely understand that McCain may not have been your first choice but don’t stand by quietly and let Obama win with out a fight. God Bless America

How does that help?

Written by Anonymous on 7:52 AM

You just have to love liberal thinking. Obama’s plan for high oil prices is to invest $150 billion over ten years in clean fuels (or whatever the current buzzword is). You just have to ask yourself “how does that help?” He is being praised as a saint by the left for this brilliant move. Talk about catering to the extremists. Anyone with half a brain has to realize this will have the exact opposite effect we are looking for. Has he been asked yet how he plans to pay? I would guess he is not volunteering his own money. Let’s think about this for a minute. The government gets money from taxes (that’s us folks). Therefore to pay for this he has to increase taxes. Therefore not only does the price of oil not go down but your taxes go up as well. All I can hope is that enough voters wake up and do the math to keep Obama and his buddies out of office. Thank goodness McCain has started to move in the right direction on this issue. In November we need to make sure we elect some officials who will have enough nerve to stand up to these fringe kooks and get to drilling. God Bless America

News and Notes: 06-25-08

Written by Paul Zannucci on 7:26 AM

From NewsMax: Bill Clinton Offers Support to Obama :

Bill Clinton extended an offer to help in a one-sentence statement from spokesman Matt McKenna. "President Clinton is obviously committed to doing whatever he can and is asked to do to ensure Senator Obama is the next president of the United States," McKenna said.

Just another example of how passing gas has become newsworthy. In this case, it's actually laughing gas. What a tightrope the Clintons have to be walking these days, knowing that if Obama wins, Hillary can't run in 2012. Yet they have to appear to be helpful and unified with Obama, who is someone who makes them sick to their stomach.

Speaking of gastrointestinal problems and passing gas:
__________

From the Eagle Times: Local Democrats thrilled with Obama, Clinton visit: Senators coming to Unity on Friday

Yes, a town named Unity. A town in New Hampshire. A town that split the vote, 107 to 107, between the two candidates. And, look away, here they come...

State Rep. Tom Donovan, D-Claremont, said he's "grateful and excited" that the two senators chose to come to Unity."It's really an honor," he said. "As far as I know this will be the first time they've joined hands."

Well that's good. Half of America will be brought to tears by this symbolic, politically expedient, display. This half-wit susceptibility is why Obama, the most ridiculous candidate in generations to run for President, is pulling out to such a Grande (I'm drinking coffee) lead in the polls.
__________

From LA Times: Obama holds 12-point lead over McCain, poll finds

Buoyed by enthusiasm among Democrats and public concern over the economy, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has taken a sizable lead over Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) at the opening of the general election campaign for president, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.

Yes, concerned about the economy, we've decided we need someone who'll tax it back to health and encourage high gas prices for the good of the planet.
__________

International Herald Tribune: Life on the fringes of U.S. suburbia becomes untenable with rising gas costs

Suddenly, the economics of American suburban life are under assault as skyrocketing energy prices inflate the costs of reaching, heating and cooling homes on the outer edges of metropolitan areas.

But don't worry. We'll develop alternatives in about 20 years. Meanwhile, we can only hope that demand will continue to fall and burst the gas bubble.
__________

From Bloomberg: Gasoline Demand Falls 2.7% Amid Record Prices, MasterCard Says

U.S. gasoline demand fell 2.7 percent last week...It was the ninth consecutive week of declines from the year-earlier period.

They make the rather interesting claim that this is because people are cutting back on vacations, even though nine weeks ago we were at the beginning of April. Reality is tough, and the reality is that people who were living paycheck to paycheck can't afford an extra $200 per month for gas. People who can't afford $4 gas are simply out of luck. They are having to find work-arounds.
__________

From the AP: Rockets fired at Israel from Gaza shake truce

Palestinian militants fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel on Tuesday, threatening to unravel a cease-fire days after it began, and Israel responded by closing vital border crossings into Gaza.

Forth of July is coming and no one will report when my neighbors shoot professionally made rockets into my yard, and this has only been going on for a few years. Trouble in Palestine has been going on since Joshua led Moses' people across the Jordan to conquer Canaan. That's 3200 years for those keeping track at home. Sure, there were some spans there when there was peace, but not that many.

Do not let your hearts be troubled. There is still plenty of time for peace before Iran finishes its nuclear program. Then the only question will be whether the landscape will be too contaminated with radiation to drill for oil.
__________

Make art, not war:


Great Oxytocin and Liquid Trust Spray Experiment

Written by Paul Zannucci on 10:02 AM

(For those who have come here actually seeking help, please see this post instead: http://conservativeprincipals.blogspot.com/2009/02/final-results-oxytocin-and-liquid-trust.html)

In the best of the shock jock tradition, now moving to the shock blog, I'm going to conduct a test of Liquid Trust Spray (for what that is, see this post). I'm going to order some today. After I get it, I'll spray it on myself and watch a series of Barack Obama ads on the internet. We'll see if I become a Barack Obama fan, at least during the supposed duration of the drug. If so, then I'll spray it on myself again and go visit my father and see if I can convince him to vote for Barack Obama.

If that works, I'll let you know, but it will be my last post, as I'll be heading over to the Univeristy of Tennessee campus to become the leader of my own cult, The Nudist Coed.

(Experiment Update: I have made my purchase:

SKU: 1Item Name: Liquid Trust (2 month supply)Cost: $49.95Shipping: $6.99TOTAL: $56.94Thank you for your order from Vero Labs Llc. We hope we meet or exceed your expectations. If there are any questions or concerns you may have please email us.All the best,Vero Labs, TRUST IS POWER - Lao Tzu, 2500 BC

Please note that I optimistically went for the 2 month supply which provided excellent savings over the 2 week supply (in the sense that I'm getting more nothing for the money). This will give me the ability to test the spray in as many situations as I want and which I can then report on here. If you have any suggestions for ways of testing Liquid Trust, please let me know.)

News and Notes: 6-24-2008

Written by Paul Zannucci on 9:08 AM

There's a chance we may not have to worry about Obama after all. According to this article from TheRegister, CERN declares Large Hadron Collider perfectly safe.

For those who don't know, the Large Hadron Collider, is a particle accelerator that might generate black holes. Of black holes, the LSAG declares: "According to the well-established properties of gravity, described by Einstein’s relativity, it is impossible for microscopic black holes to be produced at the LHC. There are, however, some speculative theories that predict the production of such particles at the LHC. All these theories predict that these particles would disintegrate immediately. Black holes, therefore, would have no time to start accreting matter and to cause macroscopic effects."

In other words, physics still hasn't advanced far enough for them to do the math to prove that black holes won't be generated and grow, but the theories say it won't happen.

In the spirit of Monty Python's Life of Bryan, always look on the bright side of life! If they are wrong and we get sucked into a man-made black hole later this summer, at least the country won't have to endure another step down the primrose path of liberalism.
__________

Speaking of the apocalypse, we have a story on the anti-Christ, Dobson accuses Obama of `distorting' Bible.

I'll let readers choose which one is the anti-Christ, Dobson or Obama; however, I'd like to point out this comment from the article, "Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama said. "Would we go with James Dobson's or Al Sharpton's?" referring to the civil rights leader.

What a hideous view of Christianity Obama has if he considers Al Sharpton a spokesman for the religion. Personally, I can't stand Dobson, but Sharpton? Geez. He's about as much a spokesman for Christianity as Pee Wee Herman.
__________

Another victim of the gas and economic crunch, In weak economy, forgoing $4 lattes for home brews. Is it just me, or was paying $4 for a latte always stupid--even before the economic downturn?
__________

Religion continues to unravel. Americans: My Faith Isn't the Only Way to Heaven. It's no longer about what the religious texts say; it's about what feels right and sounds good.

"The survey shows religion in America is, indeed, 3,000 miles wide and only three inches deep," said D. Michael Lindsay, a Rice University sociologist of religion.

Ain't that the truth. And all this theology of convenience is having a toll on faith in general. Even atheists are struggling: 21 percent of self-identified atheists said they believe in God or a universal spirit, with 8 percent "absolutely certain" of it.

Hmmm. Would it be too misanthropic of me to pull for the black hole thingy?
__________

Speaking of being misanthropic, there is a cure for me right around the corner: Scientists find childbirth wonder drug that can 'cure' shyness .

As it turns out, the drug, oxytocin, is a sort of real love potion, creating a feeling of attachment for the person taking it, making them like, or love, other people more and thus lifting their shyness, making them more trustful, etc. Count me out. I'll just stay in my cabin writing my manifestos.

But this is especially funny given this product, Liquid Trust Spray, which promotes oxytocin as an aerosol you can use to get others to trust you. Seriously, go look at the site; it's kind of freaky. But as you are filling out the order form and typing in your credit card number, keep in mind that you're actually spraying the stuff on yourself, which means that it will be you, much more than the people around you (if they are impacted at all, which is doubtful) who will suddenly become drunk with love and trust. It will be like having one too many drinks at the bar and thinking that suddenly everyone around you is finding you funny.

On the bright side, there is real science out there being conducted on this drug as a therapy for autism and certain anxiety disorders. Just stay away from the Liquid Trust.

(Ed update: I decided to conduct the Great Oxytocin and Liquid Trust Spray Experiment--purely in the name of science)

New and Notes: 06-23-08

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:58 AM

(sorry I'm late. I was on the phone all morning.)

From AP: Oil rises despite Saudi output pledge

Saudi Arabia said Sunday it would produce more crude oil this year if the market needs it. The kingdom announced a 300,000 barrel per day production increase in May and said before the start of the meeting in Jeddah that it would add another 200,000 barrels per day in July, raising total daily output to 9.7 million barrels.

There you go, the awful truth. Saudi Arabia announces that it's trying to help and pushes production up a measly 200,000 barrels. Please note that their entire production will then be 9.9 million barrels a day and that we could be getting 7.5 million barrels a day for the next 20 years out of ANWR. Yet people say that the amount of oil in ANWR isn't worth the effort. That means they are lying.
__________

From TheGuardian: Put oil firm chiefs on trial, says leading climate change "scientist"

James Hansen, one of the world's leading climate "scientists", will today call for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming in the same way that tobacco companies blurred the links between smoking and cancer.

Once again, major media outlets forget to use quotation marks when referring to climate "scientists". Let's make something absolutely clear about science. Science works within a paradigm. Scientists almost always have an end result in mind when they formulate theories and run experiments. These "end results in mind" typically fall under the umbrella of the current scientific paradigm. This is well and good. However, climate science is in its infancy and is really too complex at this point for the normal model to work. You see, the paradigm is too grand right now due to a lack of knowledge. Climate "scientists" can never break the paradigm because there is always just another way of looking at the information. And a new science without a breakable paradigm is not a science at all. It's closer to astrology.

If the hurricanes weren't worse, then they weren't supposed to be. If it's raining a lot this year, then it's supposed to be. If the hole in the ozone layer magically closes, then it was supposed to close. If we have a few years cooler than normal, then we were supposed to. You see, the current state of climate knowledge is so poor that anything that happens can be worked into the climate change, anthropogenic global warming paradigm.

It's bunk, and I don't care if they sue me.
__________

From the AP: McCain offers $300 million for new auto battery

The Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting thinks the government should offer a $300 million prize to the person who can develop an automobile battery that leapfrogs existing technology.

Now we're talking. They had people falling over themselves to win a few million dollars in the x-prize race to space. Perhaps $300 million can, in fact, inspire a new technology; although people in the know who I talk to say it isn't possible under the laws of physics and chemistry to improve battery technology that much. I suppose we'll see.
__________


Iraq to award oil contracts to foreign firms

Iraq will award contracts to 41 foreign oil firms in a bid to boost production that could give multinationals a potentially lucrative foothold in huge but underdeveloped oil fields, an official said on Sunday...Iraq's crude reserves are estimated at about 115 billion barrels, but it is sorely lacking in infrastructure and the latest technology to which it was denied access under years of international sanctions after the 1991 Gulf War.

Get that? 115 billion barrels? That's 100% of the current U.S. consumption for over 15 years. That's a lot of oil. Sorry Dems, but if the war wasn't about oil, maybe it should have been. Get rid of the bozo, terrorist dictator and let Iraqis restore their economy and get at their natural resources. Sounds like a win-win to me.
__________

Supreme Court meets Monday morning

No quotes. Just asking for a moment of silent prayer after their last decisions.

How's Life with a Democrat Majority? A Contract ON America

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:14 PM

Ah, it was only a year-and-a-half ago, and yet it was the good old days. Gas prices were up just a bit because of hurricanes, but the Democrats had a plan and a promise. Sweeping into Congress, they had a "Contract on America": The Pelosi Premium.

Gas prices under the Democratic Majority. Hmmm. If this were a temperature chart, the Democrats would say it proved anthropogenic global warming.






Hey, why not pay a little extra over here so we can stop using all that oil that China and India need to grow their economies? Thanks to the boom in China and India, not one whiff of Carbon has been reduced from American efforts. So lets just pay a little extra on everything while they work it out, Kyoto free.








I can only hope that the Democrats don't fail so miserably in their promises this next time around.



Sign the petition. Call your congressman. Kill the "Fairness" Doctrine

Written by Paul Zannucci on 11:33 AM


First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Those who fail to act for the preservation of liberty deserve the tyranny they receive. Free speech, something so integral to freedom and to the idea of America that our Founding Fathers decided to address it in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is under assault by the politically expedient Democrats.


Unable to legitimately compete in the talk radio format, Democrats have repeatedly threatened the return of the "Fairness" Doctrine, which would require broadcasters to "give both sides equal treatment". Despite what you keep hearing from liberal media outlets, Democrats have, in fact, quietly kept the possibility of reinstating this odd "fairness" open, likely waiting for the November elections in hope of an Obama victory. If you think the Democrats aren't really looking at it, go here for a short selection of quotes from leading liberals. The list includes such notable folks as: Senator Durbin, Senator Feinstein, Senator Kerry, Speaker Pelosi, and Representative Kucinich.


If that's not good enough for you, you should know that 115 members of Congress voted against last year's one-year moratorium against the Fairness Doctrine. That's 115 members who voted against it even though they had absolutely no chance to reinstate the "fairness" under the Bush administration. If that many liberals were willing to try to install widespread censorship when it had no chance of passing, how many will vote for it when a Democrat is in the White House? They must be forced to sign the Broadcaster Freedom Act into permanent law. They must be forced to do it now.


If you are confused as to what makes the "Fairness" Doctrine a bad thing, go here. Essentially, the "Fairness" Doctrine would require broadcasters to provide equal coverage for both sides of "controversial" topics, as determined by the FCC. Make no mistake, however, the goal is not to provide balance, even though that goal would be misguided enough. The goal is to silence the opposition. In fact, both President Kennedy and President Nixon were famous for using the FCC to silent opposition the last time we had the "Fairness" Doctrine:


May 14, American Spectator:
***Bill Ruder, an assistant secretary of commerce under John F. Kennedy, admitted to CBS News producer Fred Friendly that "our massive strategy was to use the Fairness Doctrine to challenge and harass right-wing broadcasters and hope the challenges would be so costly to them that they would be inhibited and decide it was too expensive to continue."


And Democrats, who love to pander to special interest groups, could find the "Fairness" Doctrine especially useful. Not only could the "fairness" silence conservative talk radio, it also could be used to batter all opposition--for instance, Christian radio--forcing Christian broadcasters to give alternate views and helping to win over more votes from "disaffected groups" to the liberal cause. If you don't believe that one, go to the Islamic site, "The Wisdom Fund", and see what they have to say about the "Fairness" Doctrine: "...the virtual exclusion of significant opposing viewpoints are good reasons to reevaluate the broadcasting Fairness Doctrine, and it's potential for obtaining more balanced coverage of Islam and Muslims." This is a site that complained about "America's Unlimited War" on 9/20/2001, claiming that the world didn't really change on 9/11, but on 9/20 when Bush "spoke to the nation and announced the American jihad."


We cannot count on John McCain being elected in November, although this does give another compelling reason to vote for him. We must act now before the Democrats have this windfall opportunity presented to them to censor open debate on their liberal ideas.


To sign the petition for the Broadcaster Freedom Act, go here.


To contact your local representative, go here.


To see Congressman Mike Pence's website (he is the hero leading the charge against this), go here.


With the current energy crisis, this issue is getting very little attention. If you have a blog or any web presence, feel free to post this article in its entirety to your site, with or without credit to me or the Conservative Principles website. You may also feel free to email it to your contact list. Just help get the word out any way you can.


Thank you for your action on this issue,


Paul Zannucci

Site Notes: News and Notes and Google Page Rank

Written by Paul Zannucci on 10:53 AM

I've decided to try to do the "News and Notes" every day (except Sunday) along with my usual posts and to try to incorporate a wider variety of topics when I find something that I like, be it political or otherwise. This will give the handful of readers who find me amusing something to read every morning. The rest of my readers can ignore that and wait for my hyperbolic conservative rants.
__________

A lot of folks have been, or previously had been, finding my site by typing "Conservative Principles" into Google. Somehow, I have angered the Google gods, however, and I have dropped from a page 1 ranking to a page 18 ranking, and I continue to fall. In fact, if you type my own name into the thing, my primary site (other than American Sentinel, I suppose) comes in somewhere in the middle of page 2.

All this is to say, please bookmark this site if you are one of the many persons who uses Google to find it. I suspect the slide will continue since I don't know what is causing it, and I may even be delisted. This is all fine. I get plenty of readers from elsewhere, but I just wanted to put this out there for those have been coming here via Google.

News and Notes: 6-21-08: Obamatized, Life on Mars, Armageddon Comes Earlier Every Year, Pooh--Secretary of Defense

Written by Paul Zannucci on 7:12 AM

Obamatized! A huge leap in the polls. Newsweek is tingly all over.

Michelle's baby's daddy has apparently, but not really, taken a huge lead in the latest Newsweek polls. Never mind that the data is so far away from every other poll out there, which seriously calls into question its accuracy, Newsweek jumps all over it with unadulterated glee.

"With numbers consistently showing rock-bottom approval ratings for President Bush and a large majority of Americans unhappy with the country's direction, the opposing-party candidate should, in the normal course, have attracted more disaffected voters. Now it looks as if Obama is doing just that(!)"

Yes, I added the exclamation point. It just seemed like it needed it.

Gee, I guess it's okay that he went ahead and adapted the Presidential Seal to his own use.
__________

Scientists ponder whether ice on Mars ever melted

If there were ever liquid water on Mars, that would make it a better environment for life.

"The holy grail is to find water near the surface of Mars," said astrobiologist Mitch Sogin

I just want to point out two things. One, why is there a field called astrobiology? Talk about foresight. We can't even get back to the moon right now, and we have people who major in astrobiology?

Second, I know a planet where the conditions for life are absolutely perfect. Yet, so far as we know, life doesn't continuously and spontaneously develop on Earth. What makes us think that life would have spontaneously developed in a puddle on Mars? Of course, I'm no astrobiologist.
__________

U.S. "experts": Forecast is more extreme weather

Yes, Armageddon does seem to come earlier every year.

For some reason, MSNBC forgot to put quotation marks around "experts" so I corrected that for them. Probably just an oversight. Anyway, we learn that a group of climate chicken littles from the U.S. Climate Change "Science" Program (they keep forgetting to put the quotation marks around "science"), says that we can just keep expecting worse and worse weather.

"Heat waves and heavy downpours are very likely to further increase in frequency and intensity," the report stated. "Substantial areas of North America are likely to have more frequent droughts of greater severity. Hurricane wind speeds, rainfall intensity and storm surge levels are likely to increase. The strongest cold season storms are likely to become more frequent, with stronger winds and more extreme wave heights."

They came up with this data during a seance, after which the lead channeler of the Earth Spirit had to be helped from the room due to exhaustion.
__________

Since Obama wants to use Winnie-the-Pooh as an example of how to conduct foreign policy, Photoshop users everywhere have been inspired: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/19/the-obamapooh-photoshop-collection/

Top 15 Reasons I’ve Decided to Vote For Barack Obama

Written by Paul Zannucci on 8:39 PM

(Editor's Note: this is in response to the I'm Voting Republican Because ad that is running on YouTube)


1) I’m voting Democrat because I’d rather deal with terrorists after they come to America rather than fight them on their own soil.

2) I’m voting Democrat because I believe my property is only mine so long as local governments can’t find a more profitable commercial developer to give it to.

3) I’m voting Democrat because I think that the U.N. and the E.U. should have more say on American policy and how American companies conduct business.

4) I’m voting Democrat because I believe in giving as much of my paycheck as possible to other private citizens in the form of entitlements and pork projects.

5) I’m voting Democrat because I believe in freedom of speech so long as the mainstream media are tilting opinion in my favor; otherwise, I believe in the Fairness Doctrine.

6) I’m voting Democrat because I think terrorists should be dealt with in the judicial system, like embezzlers, rather than like enemy combatants.

7) I’m voting Democrat because I think the solution to education problems is more money—the more the better—because nothing makes you smarter than cash.

8) I’m voting Democrat because I think the problem with elections is that some polling places are insistent on undermining the voice of the people by determining if folks are registered voters, citizens, alive and only voting once.

9) I’m voting Democrat because I believe it’s better to pay $5 for a gallon of gas and have $300 heating bills than to drill for more oil and build new nuclear plants.

10) I’m voting Democrat because I believe the best way to stimulate the economy is to tax it. It’s like tough love.

11) I’m voting Democrat because I believe the best voter is one that can be convinced he’s about to lose something important to him; or one who can be convinced he’s owed something he didn’t earn.

12) I’m voting Democrat because I believe it’s not about what I can do for my country, but what my country can do for me.

13) I’m voting Democrat because I believe the true meaning of liberty is not that all are given equal opportunity but that all are made equal by law.

14) I’m voting Democrat because I believe in negotiating with terrorist states.

15) I’m voting Democrat because I am more outraged by photographs of nude terrorists at Abu Ghraib than I am by videos of planes hitting the twin towers.